Docs

Search and contents

Collaboration agreements, task graphs and scheduling

Different executors hand work over under one goal and contract; the coordination system references domain records instead of creating a second source of truth. Goal agreement → roles → dependencies → resources and authorization → handoff checks → contribution and review.

In developmentNot availableVerified

Collaboration agreements, task graphs and scheduling diagram (A19) (open full-size figure)
MYRILUM architecture map v2.2 · A19 (public edition). Labels are in Chinese; every element is listed in English below. Select the diagram to open it at full size.

What this map shows

This is MYRILUM's target architecture. It does not mean everything on the map is live; whether a capability can be used today is stated in “Current availability”.

Different executors hand work over under the same goal and contract; the coordination system references domain records and never creates a second source of truth.

Goal agreement → roles and responsibilities → task dependencies → resources and authorization → handoff checks → contribution and review.

The collaboration agreement

Shared goal and boundariesGoals, non-goals, deadline, budget, inputs and delivery standards
Roles and responsibilitiesOwner, executor, reviewer, approver and acceptor
Commitments and termsScope of work, responsibilities, permissions and how changes happen
Executable specificationTask inputs and outputs, pre- and post-conditions and check rules

The task graph and preparing work

Versioned task graphSequence, parallel work, joins, conditional branches and human waits
Dependency checksPreconditions on materials, tasks, authorization and resources
Matching capabilities and peopleAvailability, capability, cost, data constraints and responsibility
Work orders and schedulingBinds the executor, resource reservation, deadline and version

Execution and the handoff contract

Professional executionPeople, agents, tools or external services run by the work order
Handoff packageArtifacts, evidence, limits, open items and the next step's inputs
Handoff checkThe receiver checks as agreed; an uploaded file never counts as done
Milestone decisionPass, revise, reject or escalate

Change, conflict and review

Change requestAssesses the impact on tasks, fees, responsibilities, data and deadlines
Fresh confirmationA change beyond the original authorization needs the matching approval
Collaboration disputesBoth sides' evidence is kept; an authorized party rules
Contribution and process learningAttribution records and improvement candidates; never triggers pay directly

Source

This page follows A19 of the MYRILUM architecture map v2.2 (public edition: restricted products and internal open items are left out). Related: “From goal to verified delivery: the collaboration operating system”; “Contribution, attribution and reputation”; “State machines and exception paths”.

Was this page helpful?

MYRILUM platform architecture overviewSee how participants, the unified entry, business platform domains, the shared core, the agent layer, the execution network and infrastructure are layered, and how governance runs through all of them.From goal to verified delivery: the collaboration operating systemThe collaboration operating system is a process-control subsystem that shares identity, tasks, authorization, evidence and ledgers — it is not the whole of MYRILUM.Contribution, attribution and reputationA contribution describes work that has happened, with its evidence; pay, credits, entitlements and any equity arrangement follow separate rules. Contributions are traceable, attribution is explainable and errors can be corrected.State machines and exception pathsOrders, payments, plans, tasks, runs, results, verification and acceptance each have their own state and never share one “success” field; saying “done” always means saying which object is done.What is available now?What MYRILUM officially operates today: distinguish website browsing, the member store, scoped delivery and component records, and check availability for the region and account.
Sources and maintenance
Region
Global
Version
0.1.0
Publication
Published globally
Document status
Approved · Drafted
Authorization
Public information
Command authority
None
Type
Concept
Audience
Technical leads, Developers, Organization leaders, Integration partners, Agents
Safety class
Informational
Agent tasks
understand_platform_architecture
Owner
Web3Capital Documentation Steward
Last verified
2026-09-23
Review due
2026-10-23
Source commit
6b41cce4496d
Canonical authority
SRC-ARCHITECTURE-ATLAS-V2-2
Content digest
25790ab3061ccd6b
Stable citation
MYRILUM-DOC-ARCH-019@0.1.0:en#overview

Machine-readableMarkdownMetadataJSON-LDChunks

This documentation grants no execution, release, or production authority.

Sources and maintenance

Region
Global
Version
0.1.0
Publication
Published globally
Document status
Approved · Drafted
Authorization
Public information
Command authority
None
Type
Concept
Audience
Technical leads, Developers, Organization leaders, Integration partners, Agents
Safety class
Informational
Agent tasks
understand_platform_architecture
Owner
Web3Capital Documentation Steward
Last verified
2026-09-23
Review due
2026-10-23
Source commit
6b41cce4496d
Canonical authority
SRC-ARCHITECTURE-ATLAS-V2-2
Content digest
25790ab3061ccd6b
Stable citation
MYRILUM-DOC-ARCH-019@0.1.0:en#overview

This documentation grants no execution, release, or production authority.